Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(22)
Methodology seems to be one of the things readers are most curious about during question time in sessions.
The methodology seems to complement well proposals for agent-oriented programming platforms.
There are some delicious shafts of irony, but the tone is predominantly tragic, and Strozzi's methodology seems to have been spartan in the extreme.
The methodology seems to be robust accurate and the computational cost is reduced thanks to the XFEM.
This methodology seems to be a suitable tool to integrate the human factor in risk assessment since it is specially oriented to rationalize the uncertainty related to imprecision or vagueness.
(I imagine most readers are, like me, thoroughly unsuited for the life of an illiterate peasant farmer).More than that, the endless repetition of the phrases "peer-reviewed", "scientific journal", and "standard statistical methodology" seems to reveal a fundamental lack of understanding about what the more cogent critics are arguing, and also, about basic statistics.
Similar(38)
As the questioning went on, problems with Huang's methodology seemed to emerge, chiefly the lack of rigorous pre- and postoperative evaluation of patients' functioning, the lack of controls, and, above all, the total absence of follow-up beyond a few months.
Then in 2013, a study with a different methodology seemed to confirm the effect.
In this context, and particularly for the case of Italy, the estimates based on the CS methodology seem to be the most accurate and reliable and the response rates are also satisfactory (Fasani, 2008; Mecatti & Migliorati, 2003; Blangiardo, 2008).
Since validated methodologies for demonstrating the impact of collaboration with patients in the context of research are lacking, a responsive interview methodology seemed to be a good approach.
Recognition and systematic assessment of the role of methodology seem to be of utmost importance to be able to draw conclusions on prevalence and correlates of (non-) adherence [ 10] as well as to evaluate adherence-interventions [ 15].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com