Exact(9)
[16], AZPort assigns one of the following labels to each input sentence: Background, Gap, Purpose, Methodology, Result, and Conclusion.
When laboratory Reference Ranges (RR) do not reflect analytical methodology, result interpretation can cause misclassification of patients and inappropriate management.
Possible values are B, G, P, M, R, or C, standing for Background, Gap, Purpose, Methodology, Result, and Conclusion, respectively; 2.
This is mainly why we consider that lack of a strong relationship between Gap, Methodology, Result, and Conclusion sentences and the title cannot be interpreted as an indication of a coherence problem.
Taking into consideration the rhetorical structure model used for the annotation of our corpus, we expect the Purpose component to present a high level of semantic similarity to the Methodology, Result and Conclusion components.
For abstracts, the system relies on the rhetorical structure proposed by Feltrim el al. [16], which comprises six rhetorical components arranged in the following order: Background, Gap, Purpose, Methodology, Result and Conclusion.
Similar(51)
His methodology resulted in assumptions that, for example, 55% of the remaining incorrectly rated 'no position' category papers should actually be rejections, while 45% should be endorsements.
But Ms. McConnell, the Bear Stearns analyst, said, "I believe the rule is a good rule and the methodology results in a fair measure of the employee's compensation".
The IMF said the new stress tests by the PRA planned for 2014, following this year's exercise for the financial policy committee, should provide more detail about the methodology, results and bank-by-bank capital plans.
In these studies, which often follow a rigorous structure — introduction, methodology, results, conclusion — "you narrow the amount of interpretability in what you're saying," Charlene Breedlove, the poetry editor at JAMA, told me.
This methodology results in sky-high barriers against eavesdropping.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com