The aim of this review was to investigate the content and methodology of published studies in paediatric oncology relevant to caring science, and also to compare possible differences in content and method of the published studies from the nursing and psychosocial perspectives.
Overall, several differences concerning the methodology of published observational studies can be highlighted.
To match the methodology of published data [ 8], we assessed an SUVmax reduction of >50%% as a prognostic indicator, and found no significant difference in outcome.
After checking the data, we will calculate the data according to the statistical methodology of the published papers.
To facilitate quantitative comparisons of T sat and τ D measurements between simulated experiments, we opted to standardize the methodology rather than simulate exactly the methodology of the published experiments.
Even though we could not find the question addressed in one single study, it is still of interest to discuss study design and methodology of studies published on any of the three questions, to interpret the validity of a potential mediation effect of vitamin D [ 72].
As part of a UK government funded research project to update the UK N2O inventory methodology, a systematic review of published nitrous oxide (N2O) emission factors was carried out of non-UK research, for future comparison and synthesis with the UK measurement based evidence base.
We developed a methodology for the comparison of published heterogeneous gene lists, and we developed a web application (http://gat.stamlab.org) to facilitate access to the study data.
It is important to develop methodology for assessing alignment of published guidelines with current best evidence.
Using the scoping review based on York methodology, a comprehensive search of published academic articles, conference proceedings and grey literature was carried out through PubMed, BanglaJOL, Google and Google scholar limited to English-written papers.
