Firstly, the current scoring methodology makes an implicit assumption that a single patient trait is measured by the ADAS-Cog.
The studies reporting these complications are heterogeneous in their methodology making a ranking of the most to the least common complication difficult [ 18].
This article aims for a comparative study between two well-known robust design methodologies, making a special emphasis in the control by control interaction effects over optimal operating conditions.
The methodology makes use of a generalized disjunctive programming (GDP) formulation which gives rise to a mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem.
This methodology makes use of a GIS-based spatial water budget model for simulating stream water availability, water use and stream flow control on a daily basis at a watershed scale.
Our methodology makes use of a direct relationship between form and force, offered by the Laplace Young equation that describes shapes of minimal surface membranes, such as soap films.
The methodology makes use of an integrated deterministic and probabilistic seismic hazard analysis to select the reference earthquake and the related ground motion used to assess the local seismic response.
The methodology makes apparent the tradeoffs a software developer makes when choosing SOA coding techniques, code libraries, and application programming interfaces (APIs).
This methodology makes genetic manipulation in rodents a bench top procedure, bringing it within the technical and financial reach of most laboratories.
The lack of an established standardized methodology makes direct comparison difficult and may limit the evidence of reproducibility.
