Exact(2)
The methodology considers three decision levels: level I – the definition and analysis of the problem, level II – the synthesis and screening of alternatives, and level III – the final design.
The methodology considers three design and analysis tools: 1) the process group contribution to preliminarily evaluate and synthesize flotation circuits, 2) sensitivity analysis to identify critical variables and stages, and 3) reverse simulation to guide the experimentation, the establishment of operating conditions, and the equipment design.
Similar(6)
The methodology considers eight main objectives, namely: four different displacement values for determined history locations, factor of safety (FOS), cost, labour and applicability factor for the selection of support design.
Based on the skeletal model target, the methodology considers a combustion mechanism as two parts: a comprehensive part describing reaction processes involving small radicals and molecules as the 'core', and a skeletal one which, in coupling with the 'core', controls the ignition characteristics.
The experiments were designed by Box Behnken type of response surface methodology (RS M through considering four process variables: CH2O2 (M), (Co-Ni LDHs) dosage, CPhenol (ppm) and reaction time (min).
The authors propose a methodology to do it, considering two alternative fitness functions, and quantifying the advantage of using this method instead of another that does not consider stochasticity, all for different levels of uncertainty.
To properly solve the addressed problem, this work presents a two stage methodology considering social and environment aspects besides the economic performance.
Taking into account the experimental results, the predictive performance of the analytical formulation proposed by the ACI was assessed considering two methodologies to determine the maximum strain that can be applied to the CFRP: i) the ACI proposal; ii) the equation proposed by Barros et al. (2007).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com