In order to examine the performance of two deterministic codes, nTRACER and the standalone developing version of the IDT solver of APOLLO3®, problems from 2D single assembly to 3D full core were computed with the same macroscopic cross-section library, so as to suppress the effects of physical modeling and to allow a direct comparison in terms of methodology, code architecture and performances.
This process was performed using Wilms et al., methodology of "Coding Consensus, Co-occurrence, and Comparison" that is rooted in grounded theory [ 28].
Using a methodology of Coding Consensus, Co-occurrence, and Comparison, rooted in Grounded Theory, a qualitative analysis of interviews among 25 randomly-selected patients completing Dignity Therapy will be completed [ 38– 40].
Using qualitative methodology, we coded for verbal expressions of negative emotion, identified words patients used to express emotion, and categorized emotions by type and content.Patients verbally expressed negative emotion in 17% of the visits.
The methodology is coded in a "macro," which is the programing language of the EMME 3 [72]—a transportation planning software, in which the un-capacitated TAP is solved using the Frank–Wolfe algorithm.
GJ developed the general methodology and coded a substantial portion of the software.
The researchers used a content analysis methodology to code and analyse the data.
By using PCR methodology, the genes coding for the specific enzymes of ectoine biosynthesis, diaminobutyric acid (DABA) aminotransferase (EctB), DABA acetyltransferase (EctA), and ectoine synthase (EctC), were identified in several methanotrophic species.
While offering choice in coding methodology, the Python philosophy rejects exuberant syntax, such as in Perl, in favor of a sparser, less-cluttered grammar.
The novel thematic coding methodology provided an empirical platform on which to develop culturally sensitive questionnaire content using the natural language of participants.
