Sentence examples for methodologies we compared from inspiring English sources

In order to validate each of the three genotyping methodologies, we compared 12 samples previously identified as having 1, 2, 3 or 4 copies copies (three samples of each copy number class) using the MLPA assay, and compared these with results generated by both the PRT and real-time QPCR systems.

Second, using varying numbers of loci with different tree-inference methodologies, we compare the tree topologies estimated from the full NGS dataset (377 loci) to smaller subsets of the NGS data (3 200 loci), as well as to a typical, Sanger-sequenced dataset comprised of five loci that are commonly used to infer squamate phylogenies.

To estimate the reduction in costs derived from the use of our methodology we compared the costs per patient of our pooled method with an individual sequencing approach.

To evaluate the methodology, we compared a simple mixture of 7 proteins and a complex cell-lysate sample.

Using this methodology, we compared vancomycin doses and levels in patients receiving heparin anticoagulation or RCA on CVVHDF.

To validate our methodology we compared only the inferred phrases for simple regulations with the ones reported in the RegulonDB or the DBTBS.

As a test of this methodology, we compared our results to this very different study in which individual proteins were prioritized as drug targets for B. malayi[15].

Using conventional dye-swap microarray methodology, we compared transcript abundance in a sample of >7,000 genes between four mutation accumulation (MA) lines of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and the common (unmutated) ancestor.

As a test of the methodology, we compared outcomes of division for wild-type cells and fla10-1 mutant cells grown at 21°C.

Using 1990 U.S. Census of Housing and Population data and a matched-cities methodology, we compared the brownfields pilot cities to other communities in the United States.

To investigate potential effects of collection methodology we compared gravity drip collection (directly from the needle) with negative pressure aspiration using a polypropylene syringe when assaying AD CSF biomarker concentrations, during the same lumbar puncture for each subject.