Methodology: Review of project agreements and reports; meetings with implementation partners; focus groups with principal stakeholders including project beneficiaries; and interviews with project staff.
Methodology: Review of project documentation, site visits and interviews Findings and Conclusions: The evaluation concludes that targets established early 2010 for Phase II were clear and met.
Methodology: Review of related research Interviews with key informants and members of the support groups/youth clubs Focus Group discussions Findings and Conclusions: The following are conclusions made from this evaluation: Project organization and management is weak and not well coordinated.
Methodology: Review of project related documents; focus group discussion and key informant interviews with those who can provide valuable information at Federal, Regional Woreda, Kebele, and Community levels primarily to measure the effectiveness, relevance and sustainability of the project through visits to the four regions, the 8 project woredas and 17 kebeles.
A Cochrane methodology review of publication bias by Hopewell et al[ 17] included five inception cohort studies of trials registered before the main results being known [ 22, 26, 27, 29, 31], in which the pooled odds ratio for publication bias was 3.90 (95% CI: 2.68 to 5.68).
Methodology Information was collected from a variety of sources, using three main methodologies: · Review of project documents and available secondary data provided by all relevant stakeholders.
The RACGP revision of the accreditation standards was conducted over a 12 month period and comprised six phases with multiple tasks, including: review methodology planning; review of the evidence base and each standard; new material development; constructing field trial methodology; drafting, trialling and refining new standards; and production of new standards.
Following the methodology review, a discussion of the benefits and limitations of soil moisture data retrieved from SAR is used to outline the scope of SAR derived soil moisture for hydrological applications.
Multi-attribute value theory (MAVT) is a well known and widely used multi-criteria methodology (a review of its mathematical foundation and of different versions implemented in commercial software is in Figueira et al. [12]).
In order to investigate the factors which affect the development of an effective water quality monitoring network design methodology, a review of past and current approaches is presented.
Methodology A review of existing project documentation and relevant literature was conducted.
