Overall, the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure using the non-food methodology is higher than when non-subsistence expenditure is used as would be expected.
Also, when the shift range is wide, the advantage of using the present methodology is high.
The methodology is high yielding, reproducible and scalable.
The methodology is high-throughput and is less expensive than amplification-based arrays, but it is typically considered to have lower dynamic range and specificity than qRT-PCR and miRNA-seq [ 23, 29, 52, 53].
The advantageous features of this methodology are high atom-economy, operational simplicity, shorter reaction time, convergence, and facile automation.
Symbols <, > and = state that effort invested with the interactive methodologies is significantly lower, higher or not different to the results by the manual correction.
This agreement is observed although different analytical methodologies were used: High-resolution GC coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry was employed to determine dioxin-like compounds in our previous study, whereas DR-CALUX bioassay was used in this work.
However, studies have shown that the reliability of this methodology applied in different countries is high and findings are correlated with the real prescribing in practice [ 16].
However, studies have shown that the reliability of the Audit Project Odense methodology applied in different countries is high and findings are correlated with the real prescription in practice [ 15].
Therefore, advanced analytical methodologies are in high demand.
