Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
In view of the magnitude of challenges that result from mental health stigma and discrimination, a concerted effort is needed to fund methodologically strong research that will provide robust evidence to support decisions on investment in interventions to reduce stigma.
Methodologically strong research is needed on which to base decisions on investment in stigma-reducing interventions.
Given the magnitude of the challenges posed by stigma and discrimination, it is clear that there needs to be a commensurate concerted effort to fund methodologically strong research to provide robust evidence to support policy decisions on investment and interventions.
Previous reviewers of research evaluating interventions to address sexual concerns after cancer have also concluded that there is a need for "more methodologically strong research" in this field, as many studies do not use validated outcome measures, have a non-randomised design, and have a small sample size ([ 30], p.711).
Similar(56)
These challenges can only be met with a cooperative, systematic approach that emphasizes methodologically-strong research with long-term follow-up of a broad range of outcomes, all of which are important to patients with hydrocephalus.
The methodologically strong studies in this area were Strakowski et al. (2010) and Martino et al. (2011).
Methodologically strong papers using self-report impulsivity measures include those by Ekinci et al. (2011) and Strakowski et al. (2010).
Many applicants had very strong research credentials.
As described in the self-report section, the Strakowski et al. (2010) paper is methodologically strong and included multiple measures of impulsivity.
Most studies - including the methodologically strong ones - found that euthymic BD patients scored higher than controls on all subscales of the BIS, involving large effect sizes.
Key points from the session were that the review, while methodologically strong, did not evaluate all critical endpoints needed to judge the effectiveness of FAST.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com