Sentence examples for methodological weaknesses in from inspiring English sources

But there were methodological weaknesses in those studies, the report said, and the panel urged further research.

The evaluation exercise revealed a number of technical and methodological weaknesses in a significant percentage of cases.

Considering these results, various studies analyzed in this review clearly identified methodological weaknesses in the scale development process (e.g., smaller sample sizes in psychometric analysis), but only a few researchers recognized and recorded these limitations.

Indeed, their predictions were borne out: The students' relational thinking improved, but again, methodological weaknesses in their study, such as the absence of a control group, prevented them from explaining their results.

Nonetheless, methodological weaknesses in the analysis of the results of PD workshops may hinder its effectiveness in providing useful and robust design contributions and facilitating communication in multidisciplinary teams.

This is a methodological study in which a case report is used to retrospectively analyse the link between a successful pilot study and stalled main study to identify potential methodological weaknesses in the planning process.

At the same time, Squier and Runyan both pointed to a methodological weakness in Matshes study: he knew the histories of the babies he autopsied when he examined their necks.

We address areas of potential methodological weakness in such surveys, including sampling and questionnaire design, respondent biases, statistical analyses, and sensitivity of resultant inferences.

This was thought to reflect incomplete reporting rather than underlying methodological weakness in many cases.

A notable methodological weakness in this study and generally in studies on bereavement is the lack of a clear and distinct diagnosis and measure of pathological grief, which makes conclusions ambiguous to information bias and the lack of criterion validity.

It is imperative to acknowledge several potential limitations in our meta-analysis: (1) For the particularity of the clinical operation, the sample size of each trial was relatively small; (2) There were some differences in postoperative analgesia drugs and dosages; (3) There were some methodological weakness in all included RCTs.