Sentence examples for methodological sources from inspiring English sources

We identified six methodological sources of disagreement in how the four biomass maps were generated (Table 1).

These large correlations persisted even after eliminating several methodological sources of confounding, including question wording, question order, and negative item-wording.

Thus, we first describe the results of the metric comparisons here, and then follow with an assessment of how those comparisons should be interpreted on a pairwise basis to test potential methodological sources of error.

Triangulation refers to the process of enhancing internal validity and providing more detailed and multi-layered information by using multiple methodological sources to gather data to determine if there is a convergence [ 23].

We introduce new morphological data for phyllostomids and outgroups and expand previous molecular analyses to eliminate methodological sources of phylogenetic conflict such as taxonomic sampling, sparse character sampling, or use of different algorithms to estimate the phylogeny.

Methodological sources of incongruence play some role in generating phylogenetic conflict, and are relatively easy to eliminate by matching taxa, collecting more characters, and applying the same algorithms to optimize phylogeny.

The other plausible methodological source for Darwin's mature reasoning was the work of his older contemporary and former Cambridge mentor, the Rev. William Whewell (1794 1866), whose three-volume History of the Inductive Sciences (1837) was read with care by Darwin after his return from his round-the-world voyage.

Details of seminal text citation in individual papers are given in Table  2.> Reviewers of a number of nursing papers (S3, S11, S24, S27) quoted Walsh and Downe [ 29] as a methodological source, however, our detailed reading of this paper did not reveal how Walsh and Downe had advanced the meta-ethnography approach in their summary and critique of the meta-ethnography methodological literature.

Placebo controlled double-blind drug studies in CVI were searched (Cochrane Review 2005, MedLine Search until December 2007) and assessed with regard to efficacy (volume reduction of the leg), patient characteristics, and potential methodological error sources.

In order to provide some guidance in the selection of preference-based algorithms for the SF-36 and SF-12 the algorithms were appraised in the context of their theoretical and methodological foundations, source of community-based preferences, and their relative potential to enhance or deter the uptake of new technology.

Multiple methodological constraints and sources of variance have limited the resolution of electrophysiological experiments.