Sentence examples for methodological shortcomings including from inspiring English sources

This can presumably be attributed to certain methodological shortcomings including lack of statistical power to detect small effect sizes.

However, most of the available studies suffer from important methodological shortcomings, including the lack of adequate control groups.

Mixed findings are most likely due to important methodological shortcomings, including heterogeneous samples and studies using a diverse range of aggression/violence measures.

However, several methodological shortcomings including small sample sizes, non-randomized design of some studies and the absence of studies comparing MBCT to control groups designed to distinguish specific from non-specific effects of such practice underscore the necessity for further research.

However, previous studies have had methodological shortcomings including the use of outcome measures which do not accurately reflect program goals.

Moreover, many of these studies suffer from major methodological shortcomings, including small sample sizes, referral biases, high loss to follow-up, inadequate matching of groups, and lack of gender inclusion and analysis [ 9, 10, 12].

Methodological shortcomings included small sample sizes, cross-sectional designs, idiosyncratic diagnostic methods or undifferentiated diagnostic groups, and use of inappropriate or poorly validated QoL instruments.

Other methodological shortcomings include: 1) the serum ethanol measurements employed in this study designed were ineffective in detecting alcohol consumption; and 2) the degree of marijuana abuse was not quantified as part of the drug screens used in this trial.

Methodological shortcomings included not reporting baseline characteristics for subgroups and small sample sizes; however clinical outcomes demonstrated physiological effects consistent with laboratory and animal findings (Tables  1 and 2).

Other limitations are caused by the methodological shortcomings of included studies.

The small patient numbers and methodological shortcomings of included studies underline the need for high-quality well-powered randomized controlled trials.