Exact(3)
Given the actual mismatch between the samples, Öst's methodological ratings are difficult to interpret and provide little useful information beyond what could already be gathered by a qualitative review of ACT study limitations.
The reviewers agreed on 44 of 45 methodological ratings (97.8%).
This current review contains some overlap of retrieved articles and methodological ratings with those found for the Region of Peel review, however, the search was redone and the inclusion criteria were different for this update.
Similar(57)
An overview of study characteristics, methodological quality ratings, and study results is presented in Additional file 1 and 2 [see Additional file 1 and 2].
C = inadequate (e.g. alternate days, odd/even date of birth, hospital number) Disagreements on methodological quality ratings were discussed by both assessors until they reached a consensus.
Table 2 contains the complete list of all methodological quality criteria ratings within and across journals.
The diversity in the sample sizes of patients with MD and CMT, as well as in the methodological issues (self-rating scales Rubinsztein et al., 1998; Phillips et al., 2009;–versus gold standard instruments Kalkman et al., 2007), should be emphasized.
Two authors (DD and RK) independently rated included studies methodological quality and measurement property ratings.
Their approach to study eligibility required a score over 60% on ratings of methodological quality.
Disagreements in initial ratings of methodological quality assessment were discussed between the two reviewers (ABM, RA) and if required, a third reviewer (KMC) was consulted to reach consensus.
Methodological quality assessment yielded "strong" ratings for 5/10 and "weak" ratings for 3/10 studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com