Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(44)
The potential biases in the chosen articles (country of origin, inventor involved in study, methodological quality) were systematically analyzed and the revisions per 100 observed component years (Revp100OCY) index was calculated.
Eight studies of moderate methodological quality were finally included.
Studies of fair or better methodological quality were included in the best evidence synthesis.
Studies rated as fair or better in methodological quality were included in the best evidence synthesis.
Ratings for the isometric squat test of fair [41] and good [43] methodological quality were found within the included studies.
The ten studies that rated fair or better in methodological quality were included in the best evidence synthesis.
Similar(16)
Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR Instrument.
Methodological quality was assessed and a narrative synthesis approach adopted.
The methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers.
Their methodological quality was assessed using the modified Jadad score.
Study design as well as methodological quality was mixed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com