Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(22)
> Methodological quality scores are provided in Table 1.
Methodological quality scores are shown in the Table 5.
The methodological quality scores of the included studies are reported in Table 6.
All FHS questionnaires obtained poor overall methodological quality scores for most measurement properties.
The studies were classified, first according to their design, and then by their methodological quality scores.
Consensus was obtained as described above for methodological quality scores, RxCDSS success and presence/absence of features.
Similar(38)
Five studies had low methodological quality, scoring <17/37 on the checklist, one study had moderate methodological quality, scoring 27/37 on the checklist.
Table 1 Criteria of the methodological quality Scoring Internal validity 1.
All trials had strong methodological quality, scoring 8/10 on the PEDro scale.
After designing a suitable document query-relevance score and methodological quality score, we combined them using various fusion methods.
The total methodological quality score used in the present meta-analysis ranged from 61% to 99% with a mean of 71% ± 9%, indicating adequate to high methodological qualities for most studies and, thus, study validity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com