Sentence examples for methodological quality rating from inspiring English sources

Exact(9)

Methodological Quality Rating Scale (MQRS) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used in reviewing and reporting results of the included studies.

Eligible studies were examined by two independent reviewers for relevance (population of manufacturing workers, outcomes of musculoskeletal disorders, physical factors, psychosocial factors, and strategies used in job-rotation implantation) and methodological quality rating.

Whilst not being rated within methodological quality rating, interpretability is an important characteristic of any measurement instrument across the included studies.

Whilst multiple studies in this review [41, 63, 64, 76, 77] use acute response designs and receive poor methodological quality rating, they may have some generalizable merit for sports medicine and science readers.

One study was of very low methodological quality (2 points) and was excluded [ 37] (see Additional file 3: methodological quality rating of included studies and Figure  1).

There was a wide range in the quality of studies (from 25%to9393%), with only 43% of papers reaching or exceeding a score of 70% on the methodological quality rating scales.

Show more...

Similar(51)

The updated Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist [22] was applied as a method to critique the methodological quality and rating of measurement properties of individual research articles.

Both studies rated fair in methodological quality were rated as indeterminate for measurement properties due to no smallest detectable change being assessed.

For each included study, methodological quality was rated on a Scale for Rating Quality of Studies [ 21].

Methodological quality was rated as strong, moderate, or weak using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for quantitative studies.

Seven studies of poor methodological quality were rated positively [14 16, 46, 50, 70, 71] in terms of methodological properties with correlation ≥0.70 with the gold standard test, with one indeterminate [69] and one negative rating [67].

Show more...

Ludwig, your English writing platform

Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.

Student

Used by millions of students, scientific researchers, professional translators and editors from all over the world!

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

Get started for free

Unlock your writing potential with Ludwig

Letters

Most frequent sentences: