Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
First, insufficient methodological quality, namely non-randomized trials, led to the exclusion of several published trials (for example, [ 59, 60]) from the review.
Important components of methodological quality, namely adequacy of concealment of patients' allocation to treatment groups, double-blinding, and withdrawals, were assessed.
Similar(58)
The methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed with the validated Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 55 instrument.
Methodological quality of included studies varied considerably.
Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR Instrument.
The methodological quality of the 23 systematic reviews in this overview, assessed using the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Instrument, was found to be satisfactory.
The methodological quality of the SRs included in this overview was satisfactory.
The methodological quality of included studies was assessed.
Fifteen studies were included - 14 with high methodological quality.
Methodological quality was assessed and a narrative synthesis approach adopted.
All trials were critically analyzed and their methodological quality evaluated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com