Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Further research of better methodological quality and with more patient-relevant outcomes is needed".
The methodological quality was assessed with the Jadad score.
Two independent reviews assessed methodological quality with the Jadad score.
Methodological quality was assessed with the Jadad scale.
Finally, to ensure high methodological quality, outcome measures with established reliability and validity have been selected.
Methodological quality was modest, with the vast majority of trials at high or unclear ROB.
The studies included are small in number and of variable methodological quality, with only one RCT.
Published negative studies should have the same rigour of methodological quality as studies with positive findings.
The study had a high methodological quality, with 70% of the quality items positive [Additional file 1].
The study had a moderate methodological quality, with 63% positive items on the quality checklist [Additional file 1].
However, the tool reported substantial inter-rater reliability agreement between blinded authors in this study, had high face validity and aligned with items reported to provide best practice methodological quality assessments for observational studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com