The theoretical approach we are interested in, called TRIZ (the Russian acronym for Theory for Inventive Problem Solving), when translated into a methodological procedure, has not been fully formalized yet.
While methodological risk adjustment procedures have already been adopted and are well established [ 11], little is known about how to identify the factors relevant for risk adjustment.
A number of methodological procedures and psychometrics have been developed to capture resilience; however, according to recent reviews of resilience scales the majority of thesescales have been developed and validated in young and mid-life populations, i.e. <60 years [ 11, 12].
However, the methodological procedures used may have interfered with the dynamics of decomposition of E. azurea, as it was slower than in other studies (Cunha-Santino et al. 2010; Martins et al. 2011; Bianchini et al. 2014).
The evaluation of the validity of spinal palpatory procedures has a number of methodological challenges.
Second, it examines the methodological procedures that the studies have adopted, including sampling across registers and analytical techniques such as quantitative and qualitative analysis.
Moreover, in former studies where the standard rate was routinely applied the effects of methodological decisions on the calibration procedure had not been considered, a question that has been shown to be important [ 18, 23], as we also stress here.
This procedure has been shown to yield superior methodological and statistical power to detect TMS effects [27], [28].
Such comparisons have been conducted previously regarding their philosophical assumptions and orientations, key elements of case study research, their range of application, and the lacks of methodological procedures in publications.
