Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Methodological instruments for creating guidelines are (among others): consensus conferences, Delphi analyses, therapeutic studies, and meta-analyses.
Similar(59)
Methodological findings: Developing survey instruments for use in countries and cultures where little previous research has been conducted about youth health and lifestyle presents a number of challenges.
Currently, it is unclear whether available self-efficacy instruments for chronic diseases fulfill these methodological quality criteria.
The authors concluded that the absence of validated instruments for this purpose is a significant methodological limitation (Alckmin-Carvalho, et al., 2014).
A potential solution to this methodological problem is the utilization of well-established screening instruments for youths that contain related constructs.
Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review.
In this systematic review we identified 30 instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of animal research.
In "Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review," Krauth et al. (2013) provided a much needed initial overview of various instruments proposed to evaluate animal study quality.
Objective: We performed a systematic review to identify and evaluate instruments for assessing the risk of bias and/or other methodological criteria of animal studies.
Methodological guidelines for future research involve the use of reliable and valid instruments for the measurement of child behavior problems, maternal stress, and sleep.
There is currently no validated gold standard or single recommended instrument for methodological assessment of risk factor studies, so a combined methodological assessment was developed for this review and tailored to assess the specific areas of risk factor studies which were considered to be important.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com