Sentence examples for methodological heterogeneity between from inspiring English sources

In order to minimize methodological heterogeneity between studies evaluating PT values, we separately analyzed results from studies using a circular and a figure-of-eight coil; moreover, to reduce clinical heterogeneity, in each outcome (phosphene prevalence; PT values), we separately analyzed data on migraine with aura from data migraine without aura.

Although methodological heterogeneity between studies was noted, particularly regarding study design, exposure assessment, and control of confounding, most of them showed associations with changes in T3 and T4, and/or TSH levels, while results from a few of these are consistent with experimental data supporting the findings that non-persistent pesticide exposure exerts hypothyroid-like effects.

At this stage of literature in the field, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions on the specific immunomodulatory and neuroplastic pathways involved in these PA subtypes given of the small number of comparative studies and methodological heterogeneity between studies (e.g. study population age and illness severity, as well as duration and intensity of PA intervention).

Within this core fear network, key structures for the acquisition and the extinction of conditioned fear have been identified, although there is considerable methodological heterogeneity between studies, with some of them not reporting these activations.

31 32 This may have resulted from clinical and methodological heterogeneity between these studies.

Methodological heterogeneity between studies was too high to allow meta-analysis.

Methodological heterogeneity exists between sampling methods used to assess TSR.

We also assessed methodological heterogeneity by examining differences between studies in methodological factors such as the comparability of groups.

The small number of studies and different units of analyses prevented meta-analysis, exploration of clinical and methodological heterogeneity, and pooled comparisons between ultrasound and chest X-ray.

The lack of a validated, mutually accepted case definition and diagnostic instrument affects the quality of the research outcomes and increases the methodological heterogeneity, resulting in limited comparability between the studies.

Variability in the participants, the types or timing of outcome measurements, and intervention characteristics may be termed clinical heterogeneity; variability in the trial design and quality is typically termed methodological heterogeneity; variability in summary treatment effects between trials is termed statistical heterogeneity [ 1].