Sentence examples for methodological differences for from inspiring English sources

The reason for this can be sought both in methodological differences for anti-DNA antibody detection and in the different selection of patient sera.

28 The different conclusions could be due to between-study methodological differences, for example, in the chosen measures of distress and definitions of pregnancy (eg, serum positive test, clinical pregnancy or live birth).

We did not find any apparent obvious reason (in terms of clinical and/or methodological differences) for the outlying results.

However, these results are difficult to compare, mainly because of methodological differences, for example the type of economic evaluation, regarded outcomes, included cost components (depending on the chosen perspective) or the valuation of utilisation.

46 However, unfortunately, the methodological differences – for example, the fact that adult hypertensive individuals were submitted to chronic IE – compromise any eventual comparison between their results and ours.

Apart from methodological differences for the assessment of endothelial function and despite the inherent consistency of the results reported in each of these studies the definition of "normal" endothelial function remains poor and the individual patient barely benefits from this investigations.

It is possible that methodological differences account for the very different results in the present study, which was based on data acquired during visuomotor performance and which applied orthogonal regressors to remove effects of task-control cycles – contrary to methods implemented by Just and colleagues.

However, by taking into account methodological differences, PPRs for LABA, ICS, and fixed combination of LABA/ICS found in our study showed a similar pattern and trend compared to national drug consumption data [ 36, 40].

The slightly lower fraction of CCND1-amplified cases may be due to all patients being ER-positive or due to methodological differences and different cutoff points for defining amplification between studies.

Methodological differences may account for our different, yet not contradictory findings: whereas many studies have employed single-cytokine ELISA tests, used plasma or culture supernatant samples, or had cohorts of newly diagnosed disease, we employed a multiplex assay, used serum samples, and had a cohort of chronic disease.

A number of methodological differences might account for these findings, such as anesthetics with different effects on intracortical inhibition [50], or weaker stimulation velocity, as suggested by ref. [51].