Sentence examples for methodological differences are from inspiring English sources

So the methodological differences are showing up in a big way this year.

Methodological differences are important in influencing the results of epidemiological studies in headache [7].

Methodological differences are also a likely factor.

In commenting on differences in major findings between MRI studies, methodological differences are often appealing candidates.

However, methodological differences are frequent and direct comparisons of studies must address this circumstance.

Given this, our methodological differences are more likely to explain any apparent recovery by the second time period [ 33].

Other histopathology studies [ 23– 28], however, have failed to confirm these findings and suggest that methodological differences were responsible for the contradictory results, due to a different postmortem delay in axon count or difficulties in obtaining well-preserved myelinated axons.

Once methodological differences were controlled for, cross-study comparisons indicated that samples drawn exclusively from medical (including clinical and pharmacological) research reported misconduct more frequently than respondents in other fields or in mixed samples.

It is worth to mention that in this paper, there are several methodological differences, being the main of them that the effect of MEK/ERK inhibitors are tested after 24 and 48 hs of stimulation of rLHR4 granulosa cells with gonadotropin [31].

Methodological differences were found a) in the conditioning protocol (delay, trace), b) in the contingency rate (100 %, 80 %, 50or less) and awareness, c) in the modality of CS and US (tactile, auditory, visual, olfactory), and d) with respect to the further assessment of the conditioned response (e.g. psycho-physiological measurements, verbal ratings).

Whether these disparate results are due to species or methodological differences is unclear at this point.