Sentence examples for methodological deficiencies of from inspiring English sources

This review also exposes the methodological deficiencies of the few studies that have contributed data, an issue that has received little attention (11).

However, the methodological deficiencies of these studies translated to poorer study quality scores and much lower PAD prevalence ranges of 0.01 0.5%.

Methodological deficiencies of the study using the weak design included failure to adequately articulate research processes in terms of researcher relationships, ethical issues, rigorous analysis, supporting data and research value.

[ 2, 4, 5] Two recent systematic reviews concluded that current evidence suggests (but does not prove) that yoga may be efficacious in Type 2 diabetes; that publication bias may have occurred; and that an adequately powered, well-designed randomised controlled trial is needed to remedy the methodological deficiencies of previous studies.

The evidence of clinical effectiveness of herbal treatments for asthma is inconclusive; a systematic review [ 10] of 17 randomised controlled trials of herbal products for the treatment of asthma in 2000 found some promising results, but methodological deficiencies in most of these studies meant that uncertainly remains.

These studies suffer from major methodological deficiencies and were of sub-optimal quality, limiting their validity and reliability.

The studies included in this review suffer from major methodological deficiencies and are of sub-optimal quality, limiting their validity and reliability for policy-making in the country.

By applying this framework, users of HEE quality appraisal instruments can become aware of methodological deficiencies inherent in existing HEE quality appraisal instruments.

By applying this framework, users of HEE quality appraisal instruments can become aware of methodological deficiencies inherent in existing quality appraisal instruments, as illustrated by the pilot test.

The included trials suggest that the treatment protocols of MS and SRS/SRT are of equal efficacy with regard to impact on QoL; however, the trials were hetereogenous and suffered from a variety of methodological deficiencies.

This is necessary to be able to learn of methodological deficiencies and acquire new methods to address heterogeneity and biases within indirect comparisons.