Those decisions related to your care, right?
Another crucial decision related to its branding.
Rather, methodological decisions about mortality measurement should be a synthesis of all available knowledge relating to clearly defined concepts of why data are being collected, how they can be used and when they are of good enough quality to inform public health action.
Methodological decisions about surveillance should therefore be a synthesis of all available and relevant knowledge relating to clearly defined concepts of why data are being collected, how they can be used and when they are of good enough quality.
The content analysis methodology outlined in Krippendorff (2013) formed the basis of many of the methodological decisions.
Each suggests that the results reflect methodological decisions as much as any underlying biological significance.
None of these methodological decisions could be made without consideration of the possible consequences that could occur.
Problematic items were excluded based on the adopted criteria (MI ≥ 30; Brown 2006) and on methodological decisions detailed below.
Below we discuss our methodological decisions.
To assess the robustness of our results to various methodological decisions, we did several sensitivity analyses.
