"methodological criticism" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to the process of critically assessing a method or approach to studying something, for example a scientific study or social or political issue. For example: "In his paper on the effectiveness of economic sanctions in the Middle East, Professor Smith's method of analysis was subject to methodological criticism by his colleagues."
The Huffington Post, which has been a hub of methodological criticism of Silver's forecast this week, has Trump's chances below two per cent, as does Sam Wang, at the Princeton Election Consortium.
The authors discuss fundamental concepts regarding the design and interpretation of noninferiority trials and then explore some common methodological criticism by analyzing a sample of contemporary coronary stent trials.
Rather than add to the methodological criticism, we offer here some findings from the 2012 Latino Immigrant National Election Study LINESS), a nationally representative survey of immigrants from the Spanish-speaking countries of Latin America that we conducted during the last presidential election.
Psychologist Zenon Pylyshyn (1984) appeals to multiple realizability to ground a methodological criticism of reductionism.
The original experiments have attracted both philosophical criticism of the second-order interpretation (e.g. Carruthers 2008) and methodological criticism by psychologists (reviewed by Crystal & Foote 2009), although alternative approaches to establishing metacognition in non-linguistic animals may be capable of avoiding these criticisms (Terrace & Son 2009).
The demand characteristics of these experiments, whose results are not supported by any other, converging, experimental evidence, seem particularly strong, and the work has thus been the target of particularly severe methodological criticism (Intons-Peterson & White, 1981; Banks, 1981; Thomas, 2014 p. 153).
In three production experiments and one perception experiment we address these methodological criticisms.
Methodological criticisms of research undertaken in the area of paediatric burns are widespread.
In addition to these methodological criticisms, the functional approach has also been subject to ideological, political criticism.
The paper raises several methodological criticisms that largely repeat ones that were made in Wachtell's first two memos.
Against methodological criticisms, we maintain that civil recourse theory is an interpretive theory that has both explanatory and normative power.
