Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The separation between these main issues is somewhat artificial, given that a discussion of methodological commensurability will inevitably involve the comparison of traditions on metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical matters.
Similar(59)
One issue is methodological commensurability -- whether and how comparisons between different philosophical traditions, in this case the Chinese and Western, are to be conducted.
There is some heuristic value, however, in beginning with a general discussion of views on methodological commensurability with a brief illustration of how these views might be applied to some Chinese/Western comparisons.
In what follows, "methodological naturalism" will be understood as a view about philosophical practice.
And the second part, on methodological naturalism, will focus specifically on methodological debates that bear on philosophical practice, and in particular on the relationship between philosophy and science.
In any case, this kind of "methodological naturalism" will not be discussed further here.
Failure to face these methodological challenges will lead to misinterpretation and erroneous conclusions.
When dealing with human beings, no one methodological approach will be entirely perfect but, perhaps, this might be one good place to start.
A final methodological point will conclude this paper.
Some methodological issues will be discussed.
Methodological issues will also be addressed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com