Sentence examples for methodological benchmarks from inspiring English sources

Specifically, methodological benchmarks such as 'testing hypotheses' and 'measuring outcomes' do not align with research designs that are justified on the basis of describing multiple, complex and synergistic social processes as these occur naturalistically.

We argue the methodological benchmarks with which research ethics committees are generally familiar and which form the basis of assessments of quality do not fit with the aims and objectives of many forms of qualitative inquiry and their more iterative goals of describing social processes/mechanisms and making visible the complexities of social practices.

Papers will be included if they are: Systematic reviews: where relevant literature has been identified by means of structured search of bibliographic and other databases; where transparent methodological criteria are used to exclude papers that do not meet an explicit methodological benchmark, and which presents rigorous conclusions about outcomes.

Systematic reviews: where relevant literature has been identified by means of structured search of bibliographic and other databases; where transparent methodological criteria are used to exclude papers that do not meet an explicit methodological benchmark, and which presents rigorous conclusions about outcomes.

Two different methodological approaches to benchmarking can be discerned.

Well-established methods exist, but there is no methodological standard or benchmark.

Our study reports current methodological approaches and proposes benchmark criteria for establishing validity in surgical simulation studies.

The methodological rigor will set new benchmarks for future trials in the field and its results will have important impact on patient care.

A multipurpose and interdisciplinary research work was carried out, which is a representative example and benchmark for the methodological approach concerning conservation and restoration of monuments and historical sites.

It is noteworthy that there is an overall methodological difference between experimental trials and benchmarking trials.

This study, although on a small number of patients and despite methodological bias has long been the benchmark to justify corticosteroids in persistent ARDS.