Sentence examples for methodological appropriateness from inspiring English sources

As a last indicator of methodological appropriateness, sensitivity of the md-IAT can be regarded as reasonable.

Naturally, in introducing a new measure or as in this case an extension to an existing measure, it is important to address its methodological appropriateness.

The results of Study 1 ("AUDI/FORD") and Study 2 ("AUDI/BMW") provide strong evidence of the md-IAT's methodological appropriateness.

Emphasis was placed on evaluating the methodological appropriateness of the new procedure, providing strong evidence for its reliability, validity, and sensitivity.

Together, Study 1 and Study 2 allow for an assessment of the md-IAT procedure and its methodological appropriateness based on its sensitivity, reliability and validity.

In this article, we draw on the results of two within-subjects repeated-measurement studies to provide evidence both for the methodological appropriateness and practical utility of the extended, multi-dimensional IAT procedure.

At least, criteria 1 and 2 refer to relevance in terms of methodological and procedural appropriateness and at the same time to their relevance for the customer.

Peer review both of research proposals and of research reports submitted for publication screens for quality, which includes methodological competence and appropriateness as well as for originality and significance, while replication is intended to probe the robustness of results when reported experiments are carried out in different laboratories and with slight changes to experimental conditions.

Criteria used for the methodological evaluation were appropriateness of data analysis, loss-to-follow-up/selective loss-to-follow-up, intention-to-treat analysis/per protocol analysis, and compliance.

This is a methodological study addressing the appropriateness of standard by-subject and by-item averaging procedures for the analysis of repeated-measures designs.

Relevance, comprehensiveness, availability, context-appropriateness, affordability, methodological rigor, timeliness, and representation of country situation were characteristics of robust evidence as perceived by policymakers.