Sentence examples for methodological adequacy scores from inspiring English sources

The mean and range of methodological adequacy scores for studies in the various chronic medical conditions were as follows: asthma 6.1 (4–8), cognitive disability 7.8 (6–9), autism 5 (4–7), pediatric oncology 6 (6-6), diabetes 6 (4–8), and other studies 7.5 (7.5).

Previously developed scoring systems were extended and applied to assess the methodological adequacy of studies (Mitchell and Sullivan, 2001).

Methodological adequacy was assessed using a published assessment tool specifically designed to assess the quality of intervention studies.

Results are discussed in terms of methodological adequacy of the studies and their implications for future research and practice.

Table  2 summarises the methodological adequacy of intervention evaluations.

Overall, 51 studies met minimum criteria for methodological adequacy.

We reviewed the methodological adequacy of studies identified by our search.

Logistic regression was used for collapse and diagnostic adequacy scores.

The methodological adequacy of the identified original research publications was strong; however, only one was peer-reviewed.

Quality assessment was performed using a study design evaluation instrument to appraise the strength of the studies and their methodological adequacy.

Despite the increase in research on this topic, a smaller proportion of published studies met our criteria for methodological adequacy (31% versus 46%).