Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Compares his method with those of Dostoyevsky, Proust, Joyce.
Numerical results are presented which compare this method with those yielding exact values and with other approximate algorithms.
We compare results from this new method with those from more conventional approaches.
To examine its performance, we compare our method with those reported in the literature.
We confirmed this by comparing the formation free energies previously calculated15 using the B3RICC2 method with those calculated here using the MO62X/6-31+G(d) method.
Finally, in order to demonstrate its accuracy, we compare our method with those reported in the literature.
The proposed formulation is validated by comparing the results of the proposed method with those in the literature.
Also, comparing the pressure drop data of the developed method with those of uniform-distribution model demonstrates reduction of average absolute deviation from 28.7% to 2.8%.
We compared the classification maps obtained using the subspace method with those obtained using the self-organizing map neural network (SOM) and maximum likelihood classification (MLC) methods.
Comparison of the results obtained by homotopy perturbation method with those of Adomian's decomposition method and dual-reciprocity boundary element method leads to significant consequences.
Additionally, the results by the response spectrum method with those by the time history method are compared, which indicates that the former is not on the safe side.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com