Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
In our method, we removed retweets from the training set so that the recommendation results do not get affected by retweets.
In the case of the Viola-Jones landmark method, we removed 997 of the 15982 images from the query set of [4, Experiment ], because 3 or less landmarks where found in these images which often resulted in poor alignments.
To achieve the BP method, we removed dichroics DM2 and DM4 and placed emission filters BP460-490 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and 535DF35 (Omega Optical, Bratelboro, VT, USA) in front of detectors GD and RD.
Before evaluating any method, we removed the smallest predicted bins (1%) as likely errors.
As noted above, to avoid not meaningful shortcuts when applying the CFP method, we removed arcs not involving an effective carbon exchange in each reaction.
Using this method, we removed from the 10'741 RNAseq only sequences, 144 contigs not attributed to Hydra, composed of 114 contigs of very low complexity (i.e. stretches of repetitive elements), 21 transcripts corresponding to known Artemia franciscana sequences (Hydra diet in the lab), and nine others matching the genome of the β-proteobacteria Curvibacter, a known Hydra symbiont.
Similar(54)
In order to compare the performance between the proposed method and this method, we remove the motion blur by Fergus et al. [34] after applying the resolution enhancement.
Due to the high computational cost of phylogenetic methods, we removed the snake toxins, the TFP domains found in Ser/Thr kinases, the sequences of uPARs and BMP and activin membrane-bound inhibitors (BAMBI), as well as the sequences from non-Craniata species.
After executing these methods, we removed modules containing <5 proteins and obtained 1290 modules.
For the above four recombination detection methods, we removed C. muridarum genes because of the much greater evolutionary separation of this genome from the other twelve.
To ensure a fair comparison across the three risk adjustment methods, we removed the influence of these variables and only included the clinical condition categories to generate the CMS-HCC risk score.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com