Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Using this method, we concluded that genes reported as harboring PPVs in less than 2% of this cohort are "clinically interpretable" using WGS and not likely to result in numerous false-positive PPVs reported to patients.
Similar(58)
By comparing the arbutin levels determined this way in the whitening cosmetics with the results obtained from the no-net-flux method, we conclude that our proposed on-line microdialysis HPLC system displays good accuracy.
By a similar method, we conclude the following results for (GVVI) and (VVI), respectively.
From experimental results and analysis of the proposed method we conclude that the method is efficient in solving linear and nonlinear fractional-order differential equations under different types of boundary conditions.
Using (7) and (8), we get x n + 1 ⪯ x n + 2 and y n + 1 ⪰ y n + 2. Hence, by the induction method we conclude that (5) and (6) hold for all n ≥ 0. Therefore, x 0 ⪯ x 1 ⪯ x 2 ⪯ ⋯ ⪯ x n ⪯ x n + 1 ⪯ ⋯ (9).
After presenting several examples, which illustrate the capabilities of our method, we conclude this paper.
Considering the results of modifications in the system suitability parameters and the specificity of the method, we conclude that the method conditions are robust.
Analyzing the performance of our method, we conclude that at a coverage of × 100, the probability for a false negative PV at that ratio is approximately 0.04.
Using this derivation method, we conclude that normal EVLWp values for males and females are 7.5 ± 3.3 and 7.3 ± 3.3 mL/kg, respectively.
When compared with results from our method, we conclude our method outperforms the other four methods as it provides the most consistent results across the anatomical components as well as the most balanced results between sensitivity and specificity.
Since axon guidance was one of 45 pathways identified at FDR < 10% using hypergeometric tests whereas neuron development was one of 3 pathways identified at FDR < 10% using the outlier method, we conclude that our method identifies this signal with greater specificity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com