Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
The current method was fast, sensitive, specific and reproducible.
The results indicated that this method was fast and simple for study of drug-protein interaction.
Results showed that this method was fast and typical time to reach the maximum analytical signals was around 20 min.
In comparison with the Soxhlet and ultrasonic-assisted extractions, the proposed method was fast, energy-saving and environmental-friendly.
The proposed method was fast, energy-saving, environment-friendly and can find a potential industrial use in the extraction of the bioactive DHAQs.
The proposed UAV method was fast to deploy, requires minimal equipment installation and presents a viable alternative to the approach of collecting pellets manually using Styrofoam boxes as reported in earlier studies.
Similar(50)
The method was faster and less subject to human error.
However, the FORM method was faster and simpler, compared to the MCS technique.
In Fig. 4 b, the proposed method was faster than the other methods under almost all experimental settings.
We also verified that, in general, the calculation of the proposed method was faster than the conventional method.
However, when the number of subjects increased to more than 200, the proposed method was faster than the multiclass SVM.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com