We adopted the following strategies in the design of our method: Two approximation metrics - we use metric γ Asup(X i,X j ) if the candidate pairs have the same γ Ainf(X i,X j ).
For each matrix and DNA extraction method, two ISO validation metrics (average percent bias - B - and percent repeatability standard deviation - RSD r) were calculated and, together with PCR amplification efficiency rates (E 1 - reference gene efficiency and E 2 - target gene efficiency), combined into a modular, synthetic fuzzy-based indicator.
We evaluated the two most popular registration approaches, demons, and FFD methods, combined with two metrics and two kinds of preprocessing methods.
We seek to distinguish the most efficient method in terms of two metrics, the distance taken to reach the goal and the level of uncertainty upon arriving at the goal.
The efficacy of CGH as a phylogenetic method as judged by two metrics (SymD or D1) varied considerably with topology (balanced, pectinate or empirical Neurospora), tree building algorithm (NJ with Pearson or Euclidian distances, or parsimony), and location of the reference taxon relative to the other taxa (basal or derived positions).
These methods revolve around one of two metrics: a ligand based QSAR analysis [3], or fingerprint based molecular docking and scoring [4].
Using one method of module assignment, the paper shows how the two metrics are related to each other, to randomizations of the webs, and to network connectance.
We defined two metrics to investigate the reliability of a method for identifying progressive gene pairs: the Re-identification Scale (RS), and the Progression Score (PS).
To evaluate the synchronization ability of a coupled system, we simulated two metrics, the synchronization time and the robustness index (see Methods).
