Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
If the Standard Deviation of Depth Change (SDDC) method is considered as the most accurate method, the error incurred by the proposed method is less than 7%.
Compared with numerical simulation method, the error of these two cases are not more than 2%, which proved that this method is reliable.
Glucose contents obtained by the proposed procedure were compared with those obtained by using the phenol-4-AAP method, the error was found to be less than 3%.
For the proposed method, the error assessment relying on the residual error function is presented [24].
With the SY correction method, the error terms do not sum up to zero by construction.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the estimation method, the error rate is introduced as the evaluation indicator.
Similar(45)
Using the moving frame method, the errors and the variations were quantified, and the error-variation equations were established.
With the use of standard correction methods, the error was largely removed.
When the data is missing in segments (Fig. 2b), for all methods the error is in the same magnitude of the signal.
For the parametric methods, the error threshold was fixed equal to 10−7, and the window of analysis slides was 0.02 s for all of the methods.
For the parametric methods, the error threshold was fixed equal to 10−5, and for all of the methods, the window of analysis slides of 0.04 s was used.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com