Planning requires computing performance.
We refrained from using methods, such as conjugate gradient, that require computing the partial derivatives of the objective function according to the NCF parameters (see Supplementary Methods), as such computations are quite costly, and as they limit the choices of NCFs to differentiable ones.
As we have seen, the ITS method requires to compute a solution for F = r given a set of values for the constants of the density function.
Naturally this method requires good computing power.
This method requires less computation time and fewer resources than the trusted computing group attestation.
The new method requires much less computing.
Importantly, the described method requires substantially less computing time with respect to other loop prediction methods (on average 1 min/loop).
Last but not least the described method requires substantially less computing time with respect to the RA (on average 5 min).
Generalized monotone method requires the computation of a simple linear impulsive hybrid equation which can be computed explicitly.
The PRISM method requires two parts to compute the scattering of all STEM probes.
