Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
This method required relatively high concentrations of MutY (0.8 mM).
This method required relatively low RNA amounts and did not require any additional processing steps.
Similar(58)
It is a robust method requiring relatively easy implementation.
The method requires relatively few time steps and can be employed with simulations having high resolution.
While the finite difference method often requires a large number of nodes to achieve convergence, the state space method requires relatively fewer sub-layers for continuously graded layers.
However, this method requires relatively large amounts of the pure solutes being studied and these are not always available or they may be most costly, although these solutions can be recovered.
Because the proposed low-complexity method requires relatively small channel information overhead and processing delays, it can be feasible for higher data rates where the bit duration approaches the channel coherence time.
From Table 3, it can be noted that the time-domain detection method requires relatively smaller SNR levels compared with the ML scheme when N c ≥16 (in AWGN) and N c ≥32 (in EVA).
Indirect methods abstract (more or less) formal generic knowledge from the patterns of language found in miscellaneous reports, stories, essays, weblogs, etc. Reliably extracting knowledge by the direct method requires relatively deep language understanding, and consequently is far from a mature technology.
However, in order to acquire high quality spectra for structure elucidation, the NMR method requires relatively large amounts of pure compound (up to 100 µg), often requiring substantial purification from extracts or other mixtures of compounds.
Second, the ladder-sharing method requires relatively accurate data for costing [ 24, 25], but PHC facilities do not have advanced health information systems or financial management systems.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com