Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The results show that there was no significant difference in auditory quality of the extended signals among these two methods but the FNN method required less computational complexity in comparison with the CBM method.
Moreover, our method required less information because knowledge of the metabolite-enzyme interaction network is not needed.
Similar(58)
This method requires less than a minute; the indirect ash test requires approximately one to two hours.
In contrast, the one-step method requires less operation.
However, the proposed method requires less electrodes than the CSP algorithm and its variants.
The comparison showed that the integrated method requires less iteration than the decomposed method.
Compared to other approaches, our method requires less parameter adjustments by the user.
This method requires less computation time and fewer resources than the trusted computing group attestation.
The method requires less computer time than the standard finite element method and even the finite strip method.
The method requires less reaction time and a lower reaction temperature as compared with the previous reported methods.
This method requires less experience/knowledge in astrodynamics and in optimal control theory than the traditional methods.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com