Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
The method reporting limits determined were similar and in many cases lower than previously published literature [29, 43].
ORIF, via the extended lateral L-type retro-malleolar approach and plate fixation, is still the most popular method, reporting good to excellent results in 60 85 % of cases [1, 2, 3].
Based on these findings we suggest that journals adopt more stringent requirements for focus group method reporting.
This contrasts with the majority of the activity specific protocols (using indirect calorimetry as criterion method) reporting the validity to be dependent of both the intensity and type of activity [ 31, 33, 34, 41, 42].
As part of the searches for a wider project on volunteer activity in palliative care (http://www.mariecurie.org.uk/Documents/Research/funding-research/bridget-candy-short-grant-summary.pdf), we searched for all available literature (regardless of research method) reporting empirical research on volunteers in palliative care settings.
Similar(55)
The method reported here is the realization.
Tag retrieval followed the method reported in Baikal seals [10].
This demonstrated the strength of the method reported here.
Meerwein arylation was conducted by standard method, reported elsewhere [12].
Prospective applications of the method reported are also discussed.
To measure the performance of our method we compared it with the method reported in [22], denoted as NRWRH, the method reported in [20] denoted as DT-Hybrid, and the method reported in [21] denoted as HGBI.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com