Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
The GLCIA computational time relative to that of the standard GLCM method ranges from 0.04% to 16%.
Analysis demonstrated that overall the geometric bias of the marker tracking method ranges from 0 to a maximum of (with a mean of and a standard deviation of ) voxels.
The remarkable interslope biotic divergence is illustrated by the fact that 62% of the higher plant species differ between the slopes and that the plant cover, making up the total cover of vegetation layers (measured by the Whittaker method), ranges from 35% (upper AS) to 150% (middle ES) [62].
The dramatic interslope biotic divergence is illustrated by the fact that 62% of the higher plant species differ between the slopes and that the plant cover, making up the total cover of vegetation layers (measured by the Whittaker method) ranges from 35% (upper AS) to 150% (middle ES) [35].
The correlation between the calculated EF and direct volumetric measures are greater than 0.9 and the coefficient of variance of the method ranges from 3to6%6% [ 12].
For all other compounds in this study the results in Table 2 show that the repeatability of the method ranges from 7 to 42% with an average value of 14%, and for 90% of the compounds the repeatability is <20%.
Similar(53)
Fifteen articles were identified, consisting of data from 22 locations in a wide range of transmission intensities (prevalence by molecular method ranging from 0.4% to 90.6%)3,4,12,13,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30.
The LOQ for the entire method ranged from 0.004 to 0.015 μg g−1.
The inter- and intra-assay accuracy and precision of the method ranged from −9.53%to6.75%5%.
The precisions (%RSD) of the proposed method ranged from 2.1%to2.5%and3.9%to4.7%o 4.7% for Sb and Sn, respectively.
The standard error in discharge rate measurements using dilution method ranged from ±1.1 to ±1.8%.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com