Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
Although this method provides lower accuracy rates for GM or FDG-PET information on their own, it shows a significantly higher discrimination rate by combining both information modalities into a single vector.
Similar(59)
The Galilei method provided lower values of the flat SimK and steep SimK than did the other methods.
A recent study [ 55] showed that, when performing imputation in a Hispanic sample from San Francisco with the program IMPUTE v2 and the HapMap II reference panel, using local haplotype weights based on a coalescent method provided lower error rates (7.8%) than using no weighting (8.9%), or a global weighting method based on empirical estimates of ancestry (9.0%) [ 56].
On the other hand, mechanical force-based methods provided lower conductivity than those of abovementioned methods (< 16 S/cm) and large pore diameters with a maximum pore volume (90 nm to 10 μm).
With increasing rpCLA dosage the EE-based methods provided lower increase of fecal contents of C18 2c9 ,t11CLA and of C18 2t10,c12 CLA isomers and a higher C18 2t9 ,t11CLA content than J, probably as a result of a modification of cis-trans isomerism caused by acid hydrolysis and ASE.
Freire et al. [ 9] reported no differences between automated and manual CIMT calculations; however automated methods provided lower interobserver and intraobserver variation coefficients.
We prove that this approximation method provides a lower bound.
However, for this scenario near-optimal method provides a lower estimate of the safety benefits than the other method.
The second is that the presented method provides a lower ratio of keypoint mappings that have a distance greater than 20.
Our method provides exact lower and upper bounds on the top event probability by using new properties of the intrinsic order relation between binary strings.
This is because GREML, unlike the twin method, provides a lower bound estimate of heritability and is affected by an imperfect tagging of SNPs (Wray et al. 2013).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com