Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The method performances are very close on the 71 alignments on which Rate4Site completed successfully (ROC analysis shows INTREPID has a small but statistically significant edge over Rate4Site on this dataset).
Similar(58)
In Figs. 10 and 11, the 4 methods' performances are compared in terms of the blocking percentage.
The method performance is illustrated using the three-tank system.
First, method performance was evaluated by considering the set of genes identified, whether by analysis of separate tissues or by pan-cancer analysis of all tissues together.
Method performance was assessed using spike recovery tests and analyzing certified reference material (ERM-CA615, groundwater).
On the other hand, the wind-induced ventilation method performance is independent of low temperature difference.
Method performance was evaluated on an existing urine matrix calibration method using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.
The method performance was studied in terms of accuracy (recovery = 78 114%), linearity (R2 ≥ 0.9990) and repeatability (RSD ≤ 14%).
Method performance is primarily controlled by the inherent geomorphological characteristics (surface morphology and elevation) of the data; however, the attributes of data structure are significant.
The method performance was tested in the selected conditions (80 °C; 5 min; two cycles; methanol acetonitrile) on samples which had been previously used for an international proficiency test.
Method performance was demonstrated in real samples showing good linearity (R ≥ 0.9928) and intra- and inter-day precision (%RSD ≤ 15%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com