Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
● Current use of contraceptive: women who were using a modern method of contraceptive at the time of study.
Structural determinants like caste group, wealth, and education were all significantly associated with access to the minimum three antenatal care visits, institutional deliveries, and use of any modern method of contraceptive.
The prevalence of unintended child birth was more than double among those women who know at least one method of contraceptive (32.7%) compared to those who know no method (14.0%) (P = 0.000).
The main reason cited by the married women for not using LAPM was the use of another method of contraceptive 360 (93.3%), developing side effect 15 3.9%) and not allowed by 6 (1.6%) husband and medical problem and the non availability of service) 5(1.3%).
Similar(56)
Knowledge of contraception: was defined as; having ever heard about contraceptives, naming a source and at least one method of contraceptives.
Deployment of these contraceptives at the PHC will improve equity in the accessibility and useamong the women in the community especially for implants and IUDs because women are more likely to use the modern method of contraceptives when they know where the services are available [ 5].
Some 42.6% of respondents and/or their partners were currently using a method of contraception (estimated contraceptive prevalence rate).
Permanent methods of contraceptive: - Tubal ligation and vasectomy.
46 Any temptation to think that obese women are less sexually active and therefore less in need of effective methods of contraceptive is clearly without foundation.
Eighty one (48.0%) of them used dual methods of contraceptive by themselves or their partners of which majority, 73 90.1%) were used Depo-Provera in addition to condom.
For most women, COCs are a safe and highly effective method of contraception with added non-contraceptive health benefits.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com