Sentence examples for method number of from inspiring English sources
Fig. 3 Sizing ESS with Surplus Power Method (number of RES optimal for Surplus Power Method).
In the prediction scoring model, the c-statistic from internal validation using the bootstrapping method (number of repetitions = 1000) was comparable at 0.862 955% CI 0.795 0.930).
Fig. 4 Sizing ESS with Surplus Power and Price Method (number of RES optimal for Surplus Power Method). Figure 5 presents the capacity profile of the ESS working with the PtG.
Table 1 Computational complexity, taps selected, and SSSNR achieved at 8dB SNR Tap-selection method Number of filters designed Taps selected SSSNR Combinatorial 561 {17,18} 6.9344 Greedy 67 {18,19} 6.9336 Roy 1 {4,5} 5.7961.
Table 5 Performance comparison between SIS-based tracking and the proposed method Method Number of particles Processing time for sampling (ms) Average time per frame (ms) Frame processing rate (fps) Tracking failures SIS-based tracking 250 23.55 96.56 10.36 31 SIS-based tracking 1000 114.33 187.34 5.34 22 Proposed method 250 25004 96.06 10.41 9.
Complexity comparison between methods is summarized in Table 4. Table 4 Comparison of time complexity between SIS-based tracking and the proposed method SIS-based tracking Proposed method Number of vehicles M M Number of particles C M C · M Time complexity Ω (C M ) Ω (C · M).
In goal programming and goal attainment methods, number of genetic algorithms iterations for finding the ideal point is 50.
Table 4 Recognition rate on the sunglasses dataset with various numbers of basis Methods Number of basic vectors 50 100 200 300 LOFESS 89.5 91.5 92.5 92 lS-LNMF 84 88909090.
Table 5 Recognition rate on the scarf dataset with various numbers of basis Methods Number of basic vectors 50 100 200 300 LOFESS 86.5 90 88 90 S-LNMF 86 92 92 92 92
Fig. 18 RFID Localization performance for the methods "number of matches – coincidence" (a), "number of matches – coincidence ±1" (b), "Bayes classifier" (c) and "Euclidean distance" (d).
Publication matches were confirmed by comparing methods, number of study centers, enrollment number, primary endpoint, primary results, and study sponsor.
