Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Basically, the controversy revolves around epistemological issues: whether, in the social realm, there is a "fixed point" at all, and whether the fact that method A agrees with method B makes either method more valid.
This makes the method more valid for the quantification of stromal subpopulations than infiltrating subpopulations.
Similar(58)
When comparing WTP with DCE including a financial domain, which economic method is more valid, reliable and feasible?
Geometric morphometric methods are more valid than traditional morphometric methods in protecting morphological information and permitting the analysis of this information.
The main reasons for the widespread use of statistical shape analysis in medicine include the fact that geometric morphometric methods are more valid than traditional morphometric methods.
This inevitably raises the question of which method would be more valid; however, with the lack of a gold standard, we cannot provide an answer to this question at this time.
We believe our method provides a more valid RCI result because the calculations are based on the same interval (8 weeks without treatment) to which it is going to be applied (8 weeks with treatment).
To decide which comparison method may provide more valid or less biased results, it is helpful if we can estimate the extent and direction of possible biases in primary studies.
Therefore, application of tumour delineation methods might be more valid for peripheral tumours and less valid for more centrally located tumours, unless a (manually adjustable) bounding box around the tumour is used to prevent delineation of surrounding high uptake regions.
Therefore, we will use vignettes, which seems a more valid method compared to questionnaires and more feasible than SPs.
While measuring metabolites in urine is a more valid method of quantification, some metabolites are more accurate indicators of exposure than others.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com