Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
The controllability of carbon nanotube cutting method is poor, which is not suitable for batch manufacturing.
The biggest disadvantage of this method is poor resolution and zipper artifacts in the horizontal edge regions.
However, the stability of this method is poor, and the template manufacturing and stamping process still need improvement.
The results from these measurements suggest that the reproducibility of this type of experimental method is poor.
It can be seen from Fig. 3a that the STFT method is poor in energy focus, which may result in the mixing of signals and low time-frequency resolution.
We acknowledge that the accuracy and reproducibility of this method is poor but the results gave an estimate in a situation where there was dearth of data for prevalence of diabetes.
Similar(54)
The drawback of the method is poorer parameter identifiability.
The sensitivity and precision of this method are poor for elements of low atomic number (i.e., few protons in the nucleus, such as boron and beryllium), but for slags, ores, sinters, and pellets where the majority of the elements are in the higher atomic number range, as in the case of gold and lead, the method has been generally suitable.
Since the performance of the PA method was poor, CV method is preferred because the method is independent of the depth of the kidneys, and that a correct attenuation correction needed for the PA method might be complicated and require Monte Carlo simulations.
Higher age, patients' condition at admission, and the amount of extravasated blood and trapping method are poor prognostic factors in patients with smaller ICA aneurysm.
The inter-reader reliability of this method was poor and a comparative study showed that this approach offered no advantages over plain imaging in the detection and scoring of chronic lesions.
Related(20)
method is insufficient
method is weak
mode is poor
method is low
method is inadequate
method is bad
approach is poor
procedure is poor
method is deficient
method is unsatisfactory
method is mediocre
approaches is poor
methods is poor
method is simple
method is crucial
method is different
method is rudimentary
method is ideal
method produces poor
method is perfect
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com