Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
The method involves standard CIS calculations with standard large, polarized basis sets on microhydrated species within a polarizable continuum.
Similar(59)
We showed that a reliable estimation of the Fraction of Activity in the Field of View, with less than 2% error, may be obtained with the proposed method involving standard planar WBS acquisitions.
This method does not involve mechanical, constructive or structural processes; it only involves standard geometric processes, numerical processes, computing, statistics and 3D data acquisition.
One standard method involves measurement of the pressure gradient along a pipe for various rates of flow and application of Poiseuille's equation.
The standard method involves comparison of data from two relatively close stations at significantly different altitude.
The alternative method involves grading all stereoscopic standard fields as a whole, and assigning a level of severity for the eye according to the greatest degree of retinopathy using a modified Airlie House Classification scheme.
The standard IPTT method involves conducting tests wherein an aqueous surfactant solution is introduced into a packed column under unsaturated flow conditions.
The Wei, Lin and Weissfeld method involves the calculation of robust standard errors to allow for the fact that the same individual may contribute to more than one stratum of the model; it was not possible within Stata to also account for the fact that the individuals were clustered within general practices, as previously.
It has been shown that for a given accuracy, the method involves significantly less computational time than standard methods.
The standard haze quantification method involves integration over the visible band, and so prevents interpreting the important B-dependency relative to its physical characteristic.
The proposed method involves simpler integrals and less computations than the standard HAM.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com