Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The method has mean recoveries varied between (1) 81–128% for brain samples, (2) 88–107% for plasma samples and (3) 91–104% for cell samples at different spiking levels.
Indeed Li [ 37] has shown that the Poisson τ-leap method has mean square strong order 1 2 and weak order 1 and this is consistent with the previous remarks.
Similar(58)
It is proved that the split-step backward Euler method has mean-square stability when (h=0.01), while h dissatisfied ((0,h_{0}]), that is, (h=0.1>h_{0}), the split-step backward Euler method is unstable.
For three incinerators using designed values for waste composition, the O2 conversion and IPCC methods in comparison to the direct CO2 measurement method had mean differences of 7.5% and 89%, respectively.
Their method had mean MinNDC 0.579 when they used not only the same three features but also another feature, SIFT with difference of Gaussian (SIFT-DoG in Table 1) [43], which is more likely to detect edges than the Harris-Affine detector and the Hessian-Affine detector.
When the branch length accuracy was considered (tree FP and FN), no method had mean error below 0.94 (see Figure 4 and Figure 5).
However, the difficulties associated with this method have meant that a consensus regarding how L-forms grow and proliferate has so far remained elusive.
However, the relative paucity of 2D spectral alignment(18) and analysis methods has meant that metabolomics studies making use of 2D spectra have relied on low-resolution bins or crosspeak integrals to avoid the problem of peak shift.
The QPlanar or hybrid QPlanar/QSPECT methods had mean errors and standard deviations of errors that approached those of pure QSPECT while providing simplified image acquisition protocols, and thus may be more clinically practical.
Notably, all of the methods had mean topological FP rates of 1.0 at high recombination.
For the highest recombination rate, all methods had mean topological FN of 1.0.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com